Facebook
Twitter Tweets by @StudentWhiz
Not a Member? Sign UP!
Forgot Password? Click Here!
Contact Us | Site Map | FAQ | Feedback
4
502422

Do you work hard to achieve good grades, but does not get success at that level? Studentwhiz has found out a simple yet interesting way to help its students achieve good grades by learning in a smart way through University of Phoenix ACC 307 Week 1 Chapter 1 Homework Solutions and ACC 307 Week 1 Chapter 1 Homework Course. Our main motive is that our students should pass their exams with flying colors. ACC 307 Week 1 Chapter 1 Homework Study Material and ACC 307 Week 1 Chapter 1 Homework Guide are also been provided so that students can learn from them. On our learning portal you will get study material which is 100% updated and imparted by our experts.

ACC 307 Week 1 Chapter 1 Homework

Price In $ : 7.99

Course Detail:

Chapter 1

Question 26: LO.4, 5 A question on a state income tax return asks the taxpayer if he or she made any out-of-state Internet or mail-order catalog purchases during the year. The question requires a yes or no answer, and if the taxpayer answers yes, the amount of such purchases is to be listed.

a. Does such an inquiry have any relevance to the state income tax? If not, why is it being asked?

b. Your client, Harriet, wants to leave the question unanswered. As the preparer of her return, how do you respond?

Solution:

 

 Question 36: Assess the probability of an audit in each of the following independent situations:

  1. As a result of a jury trial, Linda was awarded $3.5 million because of job discrimination. The award included $3 million for punitive damages.  
  2. Mel operates a combination check-cashing service and pawnshop.
  3. Jayden, a self-employed trial lawyer, routinely files a Schedule C (Form 1040) that, due to large deductions, reports little (if any) profit from his practice.
  4. Bernard is the head server at an upscale restaurant and recently paid $1.8 million for a residence in an exclusive gated community
  5. Homer has yearly AGI of around $70,000 and always claims the standard deduction. He works for a builder installing wallboard in new homes.
  6. Gloria lost a Form 1099–DIV that she received from a corporation that paid her a dividend.
  7. Cindy, a former vice president of a bank, has been charged with embezzling large sums of money.
  8. Giselle is a cocktail waitress at an upscale nightclub. She has been audited several times in past years.

 

  1. Marcus was recently assessed a large state income tax deficiency by the state of California for his utilization of an abusive tax shelter.

 

  1. Guy, a professional gambler, recently broke up with his companion of 10 years and married her teenage daughter.

 

Question 42: On a Federal income tax return filed five years ago, Andy inadvertently omitted a large amount of gross income.

a. Andy seeks your advice as to whether the IRS is barred from assessing additional income tax in the event he is audited. What is your advice?

b. Would your advice differ if you were the person who prepared the return in question? Explain.

c. Suppose Andy asks you to prepare his current year’s return. Would you do so? Explain.

Solution:

 

Question 50: Discuss the probable justification for each of the following aspects of the tax law:

  1. A tax credit is allowed for amounts spent to furnish care for minor children while the parent works.
  2. Deductions for interest on home mortgage and property taxes on personal residence.
  3. The income splitting benefits of filing a joint return.
  4. Gambling losses in excess of gambling gains.
  5. Net operating losses of a current year can be carried back to profitable years.
  6. A taxpayer who sells property on an instalment basis can recognize gain on the sale over the period the payments are received.
  7. The exclusion from Federal tax of certain interest income from state and local bonds.
  8. Prepaid income is taxed to the recipient in the year received and not in the year it is earned.

 

Question 53.  Edward leases real estate to Janet for a period of 20 years. Janet makes capital improvements to the property. When the lease expires, Edward reclaims the property, including the improvements made by Janet.

 

  1. Under current law, at what point does Edward recognize income as a result of Janet’s improvements?
  2. Has the law in part (a) always been the rule?
  3. What is the justification, if any, for the current rule?

 

 
Other Related Tutorials of the Week